Strata Law & Order: Special Parking Hypocrisy Unit

neighbour: EVerYoNe sHouLD rEspECt thE VisiTOr ParKiNg!!!!!!


also neighbour:

















































































































FACTS
  • Lot owner occupied that single visitor parking spot for nearly 30% of the entire period.
  • Given that there are only three visitor spots, they effectively monopolised 10% of all available visitor parking across those months.

That’s a staggering amount for someone now claiming to be a champion of visitor parking fairness.

The hypocrisy is wild.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Successful NCAT Smoke Drift outcome under s153

Image
In April of 2021 I purchased an apartment in Rockdale in the inner south of Sydney, and moved in with my two teens, who were 13 and 15 at the time. We lived there very happily for 18 months until November 2022, when new neighbours moved into the unit next door. They announced that they were smokers, and promptly started smoking on their balcony multiple times a day. The smoke from their cigarettes wafted into my unit and filled my house with the smell. I was only mildly alarmed at first because I was certain that we were covered by the by-laws and it would all work itself out. Upon reviewing the purchase documentation I was horrified to discover that we didn't have a smoke drift by-law. It was simply an oversight on my part; I'd never had this problem anywhere else; and I'd lived in many units and townhouses before this. I knew at that moment that I was in big trouble. Firstly, I work from home several days per week. Secondly, I have children living here. Lastly, I have...
Read more

Claim for Damages under s106(5)

Image
On Tuesday 21st January 2025 I attended NCAT as the applicant seeking damages under s106(5) after a wastewater pipe blocked and flooded my apartment, causing damage to fixtures and fittings. Here is a recount of my experience. +++++++++ My hearing was at 1:15pm at Goulburn Street. Presiding was Senior Member Tyson. I appeared by myself as the applicant. My strata manager appeared on behalf of the OC, the respondent. One of my neighbours and fellow committee member tagged along on behalf of the OC as well. He and I have had a longstanding animosity: he was one of the key supporters of the respondents in my smoke drift litigation in 2023 ; he and his wife submitted affidavits full of the most ridiculous nonsense and outright fabrications in an attempt to discredit me and undermine my case. He is also very vocal about NOT spending money to repair the common property. The first thing the tribunal member said was, “Is there any chance we can resolve this by having a discussion with the ...
Read more